♻️

Sterling

Cost and carbon estimating for construction

Cloud-based SaaS platform that integrates cost estimating and carbon tracking, enabling construction teams to align embodied carbon with project budgets and meet ESG requirements.

$2.95M raised 📈 Growth Stage
Founded 2018 15+ construction firms including Morgan Sindall, Turner & Townsend, WSP, Phillips, Birmingham Airport

Why This Tool Exists

⚠️

The Problem

Construction teams manage cost and carbon separately, making it difficult to optimize for both sustainability and budget. Manual carbon tracking adds hours of additional work, and teams lack visibility into the embodied carbon impact of design and material choices.

The Solution

Sterling integrates cost estimating and carbon accounting in a single platform, aligning budget with carbon footprint through shared resources and pricing data. Teams can quickly identify lower-carbon material alternatives and track ESG compliance throughout the project lifecycle.

How You Use It

🚀

Delivery Method

SaaS
🔌

Integrations

Autodesk Construction Cloud (Docs & Cost) Procore Microsoft SharePoint Building Transparency EC3 Tool Microsoft Power BI 2050 Materials (coming soon)
Disciplines
Construction, Architecture, Quantity Surveying
Project Phases
Bidding/Procurement, Construction Documentation, Construction Administration
Project Types
Commercial, Infrastructure, Residential, Mixed-Use

Data Transparency

Exactly what this tool uses and how

📥

Input

What it needs

Required: Design drawings or BIM models, Cost estimate data or budget
Optional: Project schedule (for forecasting), Quality checklists, Subcontractor bid data
Formats: PDF, DWG, IFC, RVT, NWD, Autodesk Construction Cloud exports
📤

Output

What you get

Format: Integrated cost and carbon estimates with forecasting
Fields: Itemized cost plan with resource breakdowns, Embodied carbon calculations aligned to cost items, Carbon intensity per material or labor category, Bid comparison data (if using Package Manager), Cost and carbon forecasts over project timeline, EPD-based carbon data, Total cost of ownership (with Lifecycle module), Carbon compliance reports (PAS 2080 aligned)
⚙️

Algorithm

How it works

Model: Proprietary cost and carbon calculation engine
Accuracy: Not publicly specified - depends on input data quality and EPD completeness
🔒

Privacy

How your data is protected

Retention: Project data retained in user account (specific retention period not publicly specified)
Training: Not used for model training (proprietary calculation engine only)
Compliance: GDPR compliance (stated in privacy policy), Data subject rights enforcement (access/deletion), No explicit SOC 2 or ISO 27001 mentioned
🔌

API

Integration

Endpoint: Contact vendor for API access
Method: REST API (inferred from integrations)

Use Cases

  • Reduce embodied carbon by comparing material alternatives during estimating
  • Meet ESG and net-zero reporting requirements with transparent carbon data
  • Streamline bid comparison with cost and carbon visibility
  • Automate resource forecasting across project schedules
  • Enable cost-carbon trade-off analysis for value engineering
  • Generate compliance reports for PAS 2080 and RICS standards

Pricing

Free
Demo available (contact vendor)
Pro
Core: £720/user/year; Add-ons: Bid Packages (£240/user/year), Forecasting (£240/user/year), Lifecycle (£240/user/year)
Enterprise
Custom pricing with unlimited users, usage, and storage; volume discounts available; 3-year subscriptions offer locked-in pricing
Website →
📚 Research Sources & Data Quality Last verified: 2026-02-01
Verified Data (16)
problem, solution, deliveryMethod, integrations, disciplines, projectPhases, projectTypes, maturityStage, yearFounded, customerBase, fundingTotal, input-formats, output-fields, output-structure, pricing, useCases
Not Found (6)
algorithm-details-proprietary, specific-data-retention-period, soc2-iso27001-compliance, api-rate-limits, training-data-policy, specific-cloud-regions
Our Commitment: We only include verified data from official sources. If information isn't publicly available, we mark it as "Not publicly specified" rather than guessing.

Get weekly insights on AEC tools, workflows, and insights.